Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is an important cash crop worldwide mainly grown for its unique natural fibre hence considered as an industrial and agricultural crop. Cotton Variety Development Programme in Zimbabwe has the mandate to develop cotton varieties which are superior in terms of the field and fibre attributes and such varieties increases cotton production and productivity. A Multi locational Yield Evaluation (MYE) study which aimed to select superior cotton genotypes through the use of different stability models was conducted in Zimbabwe at fifteen various locations from 2014/15 – 2020/21 season. Fifteen genotypes that are in the advanced stage of testing before final recommendation for possible release were evaluated. The trials was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Genstat 18th Edition was used to generate the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), genotype stability and environments performance. Results from the accumulated Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of seed cotton yield indicated highly significant differences (P<0.001) due to genotypic, environmental, and GE interaction effects revealing more contribution (43.1%) of the total variation due to the environmental effects hence environments were variable and caused many fluctuations in seed cotton yield. Genotypic effects and GEI explained 0.9% and 8.7% respectively to the total variation whilst the seasons contributed about 19.7%. Matikwa and Chitekete recorded the highest total seed cotton of 3567kgha-1 and 3534kgha-1 respectively followed by Chizvirizvi that scored 2681kgha-1. Stability parameters, both multivariate and univariate were used in the study. Genotype and Genotype by Environment (GGE) biplot indicated that SZ-95-23 was an ideal, high-performing, and stable genotype and was the winner at ten test locations. Use of Wricke’s Ecovalence and Finlay and Wilkinson’s models also indicated that SZ-95-23 was the superior genotype possessing good yield performance, stability, and wide adaptability, recomended for commercial release and cultivation.
Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11 |
Page(s) | 130-138 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Stability, Genotype by Environment Interaction (GEI), Total Seed Cotton Yield, Genotype and Genotype by Environment
[1] | Agricultural Marketing Authority. Cotton production trend 2020 (average yield, production, and area under production) for the period 2000 -2019. |
[2] | Becker, H. C. and Leon, J. (1988) Stability Analysis in Plant Breeding. Plant Breeding, 101, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x. |
[3] | Crossa, J. – Gauch, H. G. – Zobel, R. W. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. In Crop Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 493 – 500. |
[4] | Eberhart, S. A. and Russell, W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. 6: 36-40. |
[5] | Esayas, T. and Abebech Seife., 2020. Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysisof sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2020). 7 (1): 14-26. |
[6] | Fasahat P, Rajabi A, Mahmoudi SB, et al. 2015. An overview of the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. Biom Biostat Int J.; 2 (5): 149-159. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2015.02.00043. |
[7] | Fathi Sadabadi, G. A. Ranjbar, M. R. Zangi, S. K. Kazemi Tabar, H. Najafi Zarini, 2018. Analysis of stability and adaptation of cotton genotypes using gge biplot method, Trakia Journal of Sciences, No 1, pp 51-61. |
[8] | Finlay, KW. Wilkinson, GN., 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742-754. |
[9] | Francis, TR. Kannenberg, LW., 1987. Yield stability studies in a short season. Maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes Can. J. Plant sci. 58: 1024-1034. |
[10] | Goa and Mohammed 2013. Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) tested over different locations in Southern Ethiopia Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (Online) Vol. 3, No. 19, 2013. |
[11] | Kempton, RA. 1984The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interaction. Agricultural cientific, 103, 123- 135. |
[12] | Kimbeng, C. A., Zhou, M. M., and Silva, J. A. 2009. Genotype x environment interactions and resource allocation in sugarcane yield trials in the RioGrande Valley region of Texas. Journal of American Society of Sugarcane Technologists. 29: 11-24. Kang, M.S. 2002. Preface. In: Kang, M.S. (ed.) CropImprovement: Challenges in the Twenty-first Century. Food Products Press, Binghamton, New-York, xv–xix. |
[13] | Mahtabi E, Farshadfar E, Jowkar M M. 2014. Stability analysis of yield and yield components in cotton genotypes. Agricultural Communication, 2, 1–8.). |
[14] | Mare M, Manjeru P, Ncube B and Sisito G. 2017. GGE Biplot Analysis of genotypes by environment interaction on sorghum bicolor L. (Moench) in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Plant Science: ISSN 1996 – 0824. |
[15] | Muhammad Riaz, Jehanzeb Farooq, Saghir Ahmed, Muhammad Amin, Waqas Shafqat Chattha, Maria Ayoub, Riaz Ahmed Kainth. 2019. Stability analysis of different cotton genotypes under normal and water-deficit conditions Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18 (6): 1257–1265 citation. |
[16] | Muluken Bantayehu 2009 (ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION OF STABILITY PARAMETERS IN MALTING BARLEY, African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 145 - 153). |
[17] | National Cotton Council, http://www.cotton.org, 2006. |
[18] | Sadabadi, M. F, Ranjbar, G. A, Zangi, M. R, Tabar, S. K, and Zarini, H. N. 2018. ANALYSIS OF STABILITY AND ADAPTATION OF COTTON GENOTYPES USING GGE BIPLOT METHOD. Trakia Journal of Sciences, No 1, pp 51-61, 2018. |
[19] | Silva Júnior A. C, Carneiro V. Q., Santos I. G., Costa W. G, Silva G. N., Cruz C. D. and Soares P. C. 2019. Methods of adaptability and stability applied to the improvement of flooded rice). |
[20] | USDA. 2021. Global cotton consumption outstrips supply: USDA. https://www.graincentral.com/cropping/cotton/global-cotton-consumption-outstrips-supply-usda/. |
[21] | Voltas, J. Van Eeuwijk, F. A. Igartua, E. Garcia Del Moral, L. F. Molina-Cano, J. L. Romagosa, I. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis. In SLAFER, G. A. – MOLINA-CANO, J. L. – SAVIN, R. – ARAUS, J. L. – ROMAGOSA, I. (Eds.) Barley science: recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality. New York, Food Product Press, pp. 205 – 241. ISBN 1-56022-909-8.). |
[22] | Wricke, G., 1962. Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der Okasiagischen Streubreite in Feld Versuchen. Pflanzuecht 47: 92-96. |
[23] | Yan, W. 2001. GGE Biplot- A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93: 1111-1118. |
[24] | Yan, W. Kang, MS., 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, Geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. |
[25] | Zobel, RW. Wright, MJ. Gauch, HG., 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial, Agronomy Journal, 80: 388-393. |
APA Style
Mare Marco, Chapepa Blessing, Mubvekeri Washington, Kutywayo Dumisani. (2022). Exploring Superiority of Different Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. L) Genotypes Through the Application of Parametric Stability Models. Journal of Plant Sciences, 10(4), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11
ACS Style
Mare Marco; Chapepa Blessing; Mubvekeri Washington; Kutywayo Dumisani. Exploring Superiority of Different Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. L) Genotypes Through the Application of Parametric Stability Models. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 10(4), 130-138. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11
@article{10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11, author = {Mare Marco and Chapepa Blessing and Mubvekeri Washington and Kutywayo Dumisani}, title = {Exploring Superiority of Different Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. L) Genotypes Through the Application of Parametric Stability Models}, journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {4}, pages = {130-138}, doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20221004.11}, abstract = {Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is an important cash crop worldwide mainly grown for its unique natural fibre hence considered as an industrial and agricultural crop. Cotton Variety Development Programme in Zimbabwe has the mandate to develop cotton varieties which are superior in terms of the field and fibre attributes and such varieties increases cotton production and productivity. A Multi locational Yield Evaluation (MYE) study which aimed to select superior cotton genotypes through the use of different stability models was conducted in Zimbabwe at fifteen various locations from 2014/15 – 2020/21 season. Fifteen genotypes that are in the advanced stage of testing before final recommendation for possible release were evaluated. The trials was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Genstat 18th Edition was used to generate the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), genotype stability and environments performance. Results from the accumulated Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of seed cotton yield indicated highly significant differences (P-1 and 3534kgha-1 respectively followed by Chizvirizvi that scored 2681kgha-1. Stability parameters, both multivariate and univariate were used in the study. Genotype and Genotype by Environment (GGE) biplot indicated that SZ-95-23 was an ideal, high-performing, and stable genotype and was the winner at ten test locations. Use of Wricke’s Ecovalence and Finlay and Wilkinson’s models also indicated that SZ-95-23 was the superior genotype possessing good yield performance, stability, and wide adaptability, recomended for commercial release and cultivation.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Exploring Superiority of Different Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. L) Genotypes Through the Application of Parametric Stability Models AU - Mare Marco AU - Chapepa Blessing AU - Mubvekeri Washington AU - Kutywayo Dumisani Y1 - 2022/08/09 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 130 EP - 138 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221004.11 AB - Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is an important cash crop worldwide mainly grown for its unique natural fibre hence considered as an industrial and agricultural crop. Cotton Variety Development Programme in Zimbabwe has the mandate to develop cotton varieties which are superior in terms of the field and fibre attributes and such varieties increases cotton production and productivity. A Multi locational Yield Evaluation (MYE) study which aimed to select superior cotton genotypes through the use of different stability models was conducted in Zimbabwe at fifteen various locations from 2014/15 – 2020/21 season. Fifteen genotypes that are in the advanced stage of testing before final recommendation for possible release were evaluated. The trials was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Genstat 18th Edition was used to generate the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), genotype stability and environments performance. Results from the accumulated Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of seed cotton yield indicated highly significant differences (P-1 and 3534kgha-1 respectively followed by Chizvirizvi that scored 2681kgha-1. Stability parameters, both multivariate and univariate were used in the study. Genotype and Genotype by Environment (GGE) biplot indicated that SZ-95-23 was an ideal, high-performing, and stable genotype and was the winner at ten test locations. Use of Wricke’s Ecovalence and Finlay and Wilkinson’s models also indicated that SZ-95-23 was the superior genotype possessing good yield performance, stability, and wide adaptability, recomended for commercial release and cultivation. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -